Swiss banking giant UBS considers historic departure for America
UBS is considering leaving Switzerland due to stricter capital requirements. The bank is investigating a move to the US or a European merger.
Swiss banking giant UBS is considering a remarkable step. The country's largest bank is exploring ways to relocate its headquarters out of Switzerland. According to The Wall Street Journal, even talks about a possible acquisition or merger with a US bank are being considered. The reason for this is an escalating conflict with the Swiss government, which wants UBS to hold billions in additional capital.
UBS has been affiliated with Switzerland for more than 160 years and is considered one of the most important financial institutions in the country. Nevertheless, the bank is working behind the scenes on emergency scenarios for a possible departure.
According to The Wall Street Journal, directors and advisors are exploring different options. UBS could take over a US financial institution and then move its head office to the United States. A merger with a European competitor or a sale to a US bank is also among the options.
The plans are still in an exploratory phase. There are currently no active negotiations and no formal steps have been taken yet.
The reason for the possible relocation is a conflict over stricter capital requirements. The Swiss government wants UBS to maintain significantly larger financial buffers to prevent future banking crises.
According to UBS calculations, the proposed legislation would cost the bank about $16 billion in additional capital.
That amount is related to the bank's huge international activities. The government wants UBS to retain more equity behind the foreign components, so that any losses can be better absorbed.
Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter does not expect UBS to actually leave. According to her, a move would ultimately cost the bank more than complying with the stricter rules.
Nevertheless, UBS seems to be seriously investigating the threat. According to the newspaper, two major shareholders, Cevian Capital and Artisan Partners, are even pushing for a departure from Switzerland.
The tensions stem from the banking crisis of 2023. At the time, UBS had to take over its distressed competitor Credit Suisse to avoid a major financial disaster.
The Swiss government wants to prevent the country from finding itself in such a situation again.
Those concerns are not unfounded. UBS now manages approximately $1.7 trillion in assets. That corresponds to about 150 percent of Switzerland's total annual economic output.
By comparison, the largest U.S. bank has assets worth about 15 percent of the U.S. economy.
A possible downfall of UBS could therefore have enormous consequences for Switzerland. The bank has simply become so large that a rescue operation could put a heavy burden on the country's financial capacity.
Moreover, it is not the first time that UBS has had to be kept afloat with government support. During the 2008 financial crisis, the bank needed a rescue package of more than $50 billion due to large losses on US mortgage investments.
After that crisis, stricter rules were introduced for banks that are too big to fail. According to Swiss politicians, those rules proved insufficient when Credit Suisse threatened to collapse in 2023.
The new proposals should address that problem. The Swiss parliament has yet to approve the measures in the coming months. If the plans go ahead, UBS will be given seven years to meet the higher capital requirements.
Meanwhile, interest from the United States seems to be increasing. According to insiders, potential US partners have approached UBS about possible cooperation or acquisitions.
Analysts cite Morgan Stanley and several US regional banks as possible candidates, among others. However, there is no confirmation that UBS is negotiating with these parties.
UBS can be an attractive acquisition candidate for US banks. The Swiss institution manages the wealth of some of the richest people in the world and serves hundreds of thousands of American millionaires.
In addition, UBS is the largest asset manager in Asia and the bank has a strong position in the Middle East.
UBS's market capitalization is approximately $155 billion. This makes the bank considerably smaller than US competitors Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, which are worth around 280 billion and 260 billion dollars respectively.
Although the UBS share has risen this year, the share price development lags behind that of international competitors. Investors point to the uncertainty surrounding the Swiss capital requirements.
According to insiders, CEO Colm Kelleher is increasingly open to an international deal. CEO Sergio Ermotti, who previously stressed that UBS belongs in Switzerland, also seems to have relaxed his position.
A departure would mean a historic break. UBS in its current form was formed in 1998 through a merger of two large Swiss banks, but the history of the institution dates back to 1862.
Even with a relocation of the head office, UBS could retain its Swiss operations. The bank provides approximately $417 billion in loans to Swiss households and businesses. In addition, about a third of sales come from the home market.
Another possibility is that UBS splits off its Swiss banking activities and places them with existing shareholders or new investors.
Whether it will actually come to this is uncertain. Some stakeholders suspect that UBS is mainly using the possible relocation to put pressure on Swiss politics.
Stefan Legge, Professor at the University of St. Gallen, compares the situation to a dangerous power game in which both parties wait for the other to concede.
The coming months should show whether the Swiss parliament is willing to water down the proposed capital requirements. UBS has not yet made a final decision about its future.